Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0525115-121131 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0525115-121131
論文名稱
Title
海洋保護區的漁業管理之模擬分析
The Simultaneous Analysis of MPAs Fishery Management
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
35
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-06-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-06-25
關鍵字
Keywords
觸發價值、負面不確定性、捕獲量、海洋保護區、漁群存量
harvest, MPAs, negatively uncertainty, Trigger value, Fish stocks
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5795 次,被下載 55
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5795 times, has been downloaded 55 times.
中文摘要
由於全球漁產資源面臨枯竭危機,過去許多文獻將海洋區域分為兩區域,一區為可捕魚區、一區為海洋保護區(Marine Protected Areas ,以下簡稱MPAs),一旦劃分MPAs短期經濟收入下會受到負面衝擊,但是藉由MPAs復育提高魚群存量,再透過魚群在海洋移動的效用,長期下來,不但可以得到漁業穩定最大利潤,還能使得魚群存量保持穩定,且面對不確定性時,也能保持其一定的效用。

本研究結合建置海洋保護區漁業資源保護的概念,將海洋區域劃分為兩區,當一區開放為可捕魚區,另一區即列入保護區以給予漁業資源回復再生空間,不同於以往文獻,只單單倚靠魚群移動的效用及透過單一區域復育能力,帶來穩定的魚群存量,而是將兩區設置為可以轉換的狀態下,捕撈達到一定時間、一定捕撈的水準後,交換兩區的設置狀態,即將原可捕魚區轉換成海洋保護區,反之,原為海洋保護區開放為可捕魚區。本研究將探討兩區狀態轉換的MPAs的海洋資源管理的方法,在漁業經濟捕撈利潤及魚群資源再生復育的效益。探討兩區域的最適轉換設置時間,透過適當的人為管理海洋資源區域,除達到保有生物永續發展的多樣性,海洋資源生生不息之外,並達成漁業長期穩定經濟利益。

根據模擬分析,得知了本研究藉由MPAs、可捕魚區,兩區交替轉換的狀態下,除了可以得到漁業經濟帶來的長期收入,資源數量及多樣性、生態環境平衡得以維持而永續發展,也能使得兩區域藉由交替轉至狀態都能獲得生態環境回復的空間以維持穩定的生態環境,並在特定一些情況下可以對抗環境受到負面不確定性衝擊。

關鍵詞︰海洋保護區、漁群存量、觸發價值、負面不確定性、捕獲量
Abstract
Due to global demand aquatic resources face the risk of depletion. In past articles, researchers divided the sea into two areas: One of areas for fishing; the other as a marine protected area which protects the fishery resources. With the MPAs established, short-term economic profit will be negatively impacted. However, MPAs bolster fisheries renewability, and thus could increase the fish stock via movement of fishes in the ocean. With by time, the sustainable harvest of MPAs could not only obtain the maximize profit and keep the marine stocks stable, but also have the utility effect to face uncertain situations.
This study is the combination of different design concepts which protect fishery resources through MPAs. One area is open tfor the fishing, the other is the marine protected areas intended for regeneration of fishery resources. This concept is different from the past literatures, which only keep the marine stock stable and rely on fish movement and inhenent renewable capacity in a single area. The intent of this paper is to establish two areas that atternate roles for when the catch rates reaches a certain time or level. The original fishing area is converted into a marine protected area, while the original MPA is opened for fishing. This study will explore a managing method which exchanges the state of these two areas, for the fishery’s economic profit and the benefit of restoring the fishery resources. The optimal time for transitioning two areas, is controlled by human efforts. In addition achieving the sustainable development of biological diversity and making the development sustainable, this strategy ensures stability and long-term fishery economic benefit.
According to the simulation analysis, this study shows that exchanging MPAs and fishing areas, in addition to economic advantage, has the long-term benefit of ensuring the quantity of resources, biodiversity and the ecological balance of the areas. Alternating conversion of these states of the two areas also provides ecological environment restoration spaces which maintain a stable ecosystem. Even with negative external stimuli, the ecosystem can still remain functional.

Keyword: MPAs, fish stocks, trigger value, negatively uncertainty, harvest
目次 Table of Contents
目錄

論文審定書……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………ii
摘要……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………vi
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1
第二章 相關背景資料及文獻回顧………………………………………………………………………………………3
第一節 海洋保護區之發展…………………………………………………………………………………………3
第二節 海洋保護區之定義…………………………………………………………………………………………5
第三節 台灣海洋環境現況………………………………………………………………………………………………8
第四節 MPAs相關文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………………………………10
第三章 理論模型與研究方法……………………………………………………………………………………………10
第一節 基礎理論模型……………………………………………………………………………………………………10
第二節 加入MPAs理論模型……………………………………………………………………………………………10
第三節 加入不確定性的MPAs生物經濟均衡…………………………………………………………………………13
第四章 實證模擬分析……………………………………………………………………………………………………17
第一節 實證模擬分析說明………………………………………………………………………………………………17
第二節 MPAs實證模擬分析……………………………………………………………………………………………18
第三節 MPAs加入不確定性模擬分析…………………………………………………………………………………21
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………………………………………………24
第六章 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………………………26
參考文獻 References
一、 中文部分
1. 沈全榮(2006),「墾丁國家公園觀光資源永續發展之研究」,國立中山大學公共政策研究所
2. 沈政翰(2011),「台灣海洋保護區的規劃—以龜山島為例」,國立中山大學海洋環境及工程研究所
3. 劉弼仁(2009),「探討墾丁珊瑚礁近年來劣化的機制」,中興大學生命科學系所博士班
4. 李明璋(2011),「後壁湖海洋資源保護生態示範區結合生態旅遊之研究」,國立中山大學海洋事務研究所
5. 陳欣榮(1997),「建立我國海洋保護區體系之初步研究」,國立中山大學海洋環境工程研究所碩士論文
6. 陳中獎(2008),「人工魚礁資源最適撈捕模式之研究」,南華大學環境管理研究所
7. 陳又誠(2008),「不確定因素下設置台灣海洋保護區之效益分析」,國立中山大學經濟學研究所

二、 英文部分
1. Arias-González JE (1998) “Trophic models of semi-protected and unprotected coral reef ecosystems in the South of the Mexican Caribbean”. J Fish Biol 53, 236-255
2. J.Ernesto Arias-Gonzáleza, Enrique Nuñez-Laraa, Carlos González-Salasa, René Galzin(2004)“Trophic models for investigation of fishing effect on coral reef ecosystems”, Ecological Modelling Volume 172, Issues 2–4, 1 March 2004, Pages 197–212
3. Sudipto Sarkar (2009)”Optimal fishery harvesting rules under uncertainty’’, Resource and Energy Economics Volume 31, Issue 4, November 2009, Pages 272–286
4. Eiji Sawada and Shunsuke Managi (2014), “Effects of Technological Change on Non-renewable Resource Extraction and Exploration”, Journal of Economic Structures.
5. Richard C. Bishop (1982), “Option Value: An Exposition and Extension”, Land Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1-15.
6. Sudipto Sarkar (2009), “Optimal fishery harvesting rules under uncertainty”, 302 DSB, McMaster University, Canada.
7. Alasdair Beattie, Ussif Rashid Sumaila, Villy Christensen and Daniel Pauly (2002), “A Model for the Bioeconomic Evaluation of Marine Protected Area Size and Placement in the North Sea”, Nature Resource modeling, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 413–437.
8. R. Hannesson (2002), “The Economics of Marine Reserves“, Nature Resource modeling Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 273–290.
9. James N. Sanchirico and James E. Wilen (2002), “The Impacts of Marine Reserves on Limited-Entry Fisheries”, Nature Resource modeling, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 291–310.
10. Conrad, J. M. (1999), “The Bioeconomics of Marine Sanctuaries,” Journal of Bioeconomics ,1, 205-21

三、 網路資料文獻部分
1. 台灣國家公園統計資料(2015) http://np.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?year=103&option=com_statistics&view=statistics&Itemid=182&gp=1
2. 台灣海洋生態學習網(2015), http://study.nmmba.gov.tw/.
3. 行政院農委會漁業署(2015), http://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/.
4. 行政院國家科學委員會, http://web.nsc.gov.tw/default.asp.
5. 國際自然保育聯盟International Union for Conservation of Natural, IUCN(2015), http://www.iucn.org/.
6. 墾丁國家公園管理處(2015), http://www.ktnp.gov.tw/.
7. 聯合國糧農組織Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(2006) http://www.fao.org/home/en/
8. Protect Planet Ocean (2015), http://www.protectplanetocean.org/.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code