Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0521120-044101 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0521120-044101
論文名稱
Title
產業特質與股利政策之關聯性研究
The Relation Between the Industry Characteristics and Policy of Dividend
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
55
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-06-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-06-21
關鍵字
Keywords
股利政策、現金股利、虧損、電子業、家族企業
Cash Dividends, Family Business, Electronics Industry, Losses, Dividend Policy
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5696 次,被下載 45
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5696 times, has been downloaded 45 times.
中文摘要
本研究以我國上市櫃公司西元1999年至2018年為樣本期間,探討特定產業與現金股利之關聯性,以及公司虧損對於上述關聯性之影響,特定產業係針對家族企業和電子業。本研究結果發現家族企業較傾向將盈餘保留於公司而非發放現金股利,電子業則較傾向發放現金股利。由於公司經營虧損普遍會降低公司發放現金股利之意願,本研究預期家族企業和電子業發生虧損時,將傾向減少發放現金股利。
Abstract
In use of sample firms trading on the Taiwan or Taipei Stock Exchange Market from 1999 to 2018, this study investigates the relationship between cash dividends and specific industries aiming at family business and electronics industry. The results show that family firms prefer keeping their earnings to paying cash dividends while firms in electronics industry are more inclined to pay cash dividends. Since losses generally reduce the willingness of firms to pay cash dividends, this study expects both family and electronic firms are inclined to decrease dividends when incurring losses. The empirical results are consistent with the expectations.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
圖次 vii
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與貢獻 1
第三節 研究架構與流程 2
第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 4
第一節 台灣股利政策之制定 4
第二節 股利政策之相關理論 5
第三節 家族企業相關文獻及假說建立 7
第四節 電子業相關文獻及假說建立 9
第五節 虧損相關文獻及假說建立 10
第三章 研究設計 11
第一節 變數衡量 11
第二節 實證模型 14
第三節 研究期間及資料來源 15
第四章 實證結果與分析 16
第一節 敘述性統計與相關係數分析 16
第二節 多元迴歸分析 20
第三節 敏感性分析 28
第五章 結論與建議 40
第一節 研究結論 40
第二節 研究限制 40
第三節 研究建議 41
參考文獻 42
中文參考文獻 42
英文參考文獻 43
參考文獻 References
中文參考文獻
王玉枝,1988,資金成本,資本結構與股利政策之研究,私立中國文化大學
企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
王祝三,2004,我國上市公司偏好發放股票股利程度之決定因素及其對長期股價之影響,風險管理學報,第6卷,第三期,307-344。
黃泓嘉,2016,市場占有率對現金股利之探討,義守大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
葉銀華,1999,家族控股集團,核心金業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較。管理評論,第18卷,第二期,59-86。
詹凱玲,2007,股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係--以家族與非家族企業之角度,銘傳大學會計學系碩士論文。
劉順仁,2018,財報就像一本故事書(最新增訂版),時報文化出版。
謝祁凌,2001,從代理理論觀點探索公司股利政策與經營績效關聯性之研
究,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。

英文參考文獻
Aivazian, V., Booth, L., & Cleary, S. (2003). Do emerging market firms follow different dividend policies from US firms? Journal of financial Research, 26(3), 371-387.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
Attig, N., Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2016). The global financial crisis, family control, and dividend policy. Financial Management, 45(2), 291-313.
Barclay, M. J., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt. The journal of finance, 50(2), 609-631.
Barnes, L. B., & Hershon, S. A. (1976). Transferring power in the family business. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 105-114.
Brown, C., & Abraham, F. (2012). Sum of perpetuities method for valuing stock prices. Journal of Economics, 38(1), 59-72.
Chang, R. P., & Rhee, S. G. (1990). The impact of personal taxes on corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions. Financial Management, 19(2), 21-31.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. (1989). A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management, 18(4), 36-46.
De Cesari, A. (2012). Expropriation of minority shareholders and payout policy. The British Accounting Review, 44(4), 207-220.
DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Skinner, D. J. (1992). Dividends and losses. The journal of finance, 47(5), 1837-1863.
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American economic review, 74(4), 650-659.
Faccio, M., Lang, L. H., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American economic review, 91(1), 54-78.
Fama, E. F., & Babiak, H. (1968). Dividend policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of the American statistical Association, 63(324), 1132-1161.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of financial Economics, 60(1), 3-43.
Farrar, D. E., Farrar, D. F., & SELWYN, L. L. (1967). Taxes, corporate financial policy and return to investors. National Tax Journal, 20(4), 444-454.
Fluck, Z. (1999). The dynamics of the management-shareholder conflict. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 379-404.
Gaver, J. J., & Gaver, K. M. (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and economics, 16(1-3), 125-160.
Gomes, A. (2000). Going public without governance: Managerial reputation effects. The journal of finance, 55(2), 615-646.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of management journal, 46(2), 226-237.
Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal investment and financing policy. The journal of finance, 18(2), 264-272.
Hu, Y., Wang, D., & Zhang, S. (2007). Founding family ownership, management and payout policy. working paper.
Hu, Z. (2002). Family shareholdings: a comparison of family-controlled listed companies at home and abroad. New Fortune (8)(in Chinese).
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of financial Economics, 3(4), 163-231.
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The journal of finance, 55(1), 1-33.
Li, K., & Zhao, X. (2008). Asymmetric information and dividend policy. Financial Management, 37(4), 673-694.
Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American economic review, 46(2), 97-113.
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. the Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of financial Research, 5(3), 249-259.
Setiawan, D., Bandi, B., Phua, L. K., & Trinugroho, I. (2016). Ownership structure and dividend policy in Indonesia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 10(3), 230-252.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Skinner, D. J., & Soltes, E. (2011). What do dividends tell us about earnings quality? Review of Accounting Studies, 16(1), 1-28.
Smith Jr, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of financial Economics, 32(3), 263-292.
Yeh, Y. h., Lee, T. s., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code