論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-08
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-08
論文名稱 Title |
員工對待如何影響創新與經營績效 How does employee treatment affect innovation and performance |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
48 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-05-29 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-06-08 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
員工對待、員工滿意度、員工異常流動率、企業經營績效、企業創新能力 Employee treatment, Employee satisfaction, Abnormal employee turnover rate, Corporate performance, Corporate innovation |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5773 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5773 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究以台灣上市公司為研究樣本,主要探討員工對待會如何影響企業創新能力和企業經營績效,並將員工現金分紅、員工股票分紅、培訓制度與多元職涯發展制度上述四種不同的變數,作為衡量員工對待的依據。實證結果主發現以下兩點,其一,僅有員工股票分紅與次年度之企業創新能力具顯著正相關;其二,當企業將現金分紅或股票分紅作為獎勵機制,或是在企業內部設立員工培訓制度時,在上述三種情況下,皆能有效地提升次年度之企業經營績效(OROA、OROE)。此外,本文亦將員工異常流動率作為衡量員工滿意度之指標,藉以探討員工滿意度與企業創新、企業經營績效之間的關聯性。結果顯示,當員工異常流動率愈低時,也就是當員工滿意度愈高時,此時可以有效地增加次年度之企業經營績效,但無法增加次年度之企業創新能力。 |
Abstract |
Using publicly traded companies in Taiwan as our sample, we mainly examine the impact of employee treatment on corporate innovation and corporate performance. We construct four measures of employee treatment based on employee cash bonuses, employee stock bonuses, training systems, and career development systems. Evidence suggests that, first, only employee stock bonus has a positive and significant effect on corporate innovation of next year. Second, when corporate sets employee cash or stock bonus as an incentive program or establishes a training system, all of them can impact the corporation performance of next year (OROA、OROE). Besides, we also investigate whether employee satisfaction is associated with corporate innovation and corporate performance. Here we identify abnormal employee turnover rate as an index of employee satisfaction. Findings show that a low abnormal employee turnover rate enhances the corporate performance of next year. But it shows no significant difference in abnormal employee turnover rate and corporate innovation. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章、緒論 1 第二章、文獻探討與假說建立 4 第一節、員工對待 4 第二節、創新 6 第三節、假說建立 8 第三章、資料與樣本 8 第一節、員工對待 9 第二節、專利 13 第三節、控制變數 14 第四章、實證分析 15 第一節、敘述統計與相關係數矩陣 15 第二節、單變量檢定 21 第三節、員工對待與企業創新 25 第四節、員工對待與企業經營績效 28 第五章、將員工異常流動率視為員工滿意度之替代變數? 32 第一節、員工異常流動率 32 第二節、多元迴歸分析結果 34 第六章、結論 36 附錄 38 參考文獻 39 |
參考文獻 References |
Ahuia, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., George, J. F., 2007. IT road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. Management Information System Research Center, 31 (1), 1-17. Agyeman, C. M., Ponniah, V. M., 2014. Employee demographic characteristics and their effects on turnover and retention in MSMEs. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behaviour and Decision Sciences, 1(1), 12-29. Adhikari, H. P., Choi, W., Sah, N. B., 2017. That is what friends do: employee friendliness and innovation. Journal of Economics and Business, 90, 65-76. Bauer, R., Derwall, J., Hann, D., 2009. Employee relations and credit risk. Working paper, Maastricht University. Bae, K. H., Kang, J. K., Wang, J., 2011. Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, (1), 130-153. Bena, J., Li, K.,2014. Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923-1960. Ben-Nasr, H., Ghouma, H., 2018. Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 700-725. Biggerstaff, L., Blank, B., Goldie, G., 2019. Do incentive work? Option-based compensation and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 415-430. Boubaker, S., Chourou, L., Haddar, M., and Hamaza, T., 2019. Does employee welfare affect corporate debt maturity? European Management Journal, 37 (5), 674-686. Chemmanur, T. J., Cheng, Y., Zhang, T., 2013. Human capital, capital structure, and employee pay: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 110 (2), 478-502. Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., Trevin ̃o, L. K., 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58 (2),197-232. Carnahan, S., Kryscynksi, D., Olson, D. M., 2015. How corporate social responsibility reduces employee turnover: Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Chen, C., Chen, Y., Hsu, P. H., Podolski, E. J., 2016. Be nice to your innovators: Employee treatment and corporate innovation performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 78-98. Chen, J., Leung, W. S., Evans, K. P., 2016. Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 61-79. Cho, C., Halford, J. T., Hsu, S., and Ng, L., 2016. Do managers matter for corporate innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 206-229. Chang, K., Li, Y., Shim, H., 2017. Does trustworthiness influence creditworthiness? -A global study of corporate social responsibility effect on credit rating. FMA Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 11-14. Chang, S., Jo, H., 2018. Employee-friendly practices, product market competition and firm value. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46 (1-2), 200-224. Chen, T.-K., Chen, Y.-S., Yang, H.-L., 2019. Employee treatment and its implications for bondholders. European Financial Management, 25 (4), 1047-1079. Chen, Z. X., Francesco, A. M., 2000. Employee demograghy, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in China: Do cultural differences matter? Human Relations, 53 (6), 869-887. Edmans, A., 2011. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, (3), 621-640. Faleye, O., Trahan, E. A., 2011. Labor-friendly corporate practices: Is what is good for employees good for shareholders? Journal of Business Ethics, 101 (1), 1-27. Ghaly, M., Dang, V. A., and Stathopoulos, K., 2015. Cash holdings and employee welfare. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 53-70. Gubler, T., Larkin, I., Pierce, L., 2017. Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Working paper. University of California, Riverside. Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P.-H., Li, D., 2013. Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107, 632-654. Hayes, T. M.,2015. Demographic characteristics predicting employee turnover intentions. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Jian, M., Lee, K.-W., 2015. CEO compensation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 29, 46-65. Jia, N., 2018. Corporate innovation strategy and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 53, 155-173. Kabungaidze, T., Mahlatshana, N., Nigirande, H., 2013. The Impact of Job Satisfaction and Some Demographic Variables on Employee Turnover Intentions. International Journal of Business Administration, 4 (1), 53-65. Marsh, R. M., Mannari, H., 1997. Organizational commitment and turnover: A prediction study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22 (1), 57-75. Mayer, R. C., Warr, R. S., Zhao, J., 2016. Does employee treatment and workforce diversity impact corporate innovative efficiency? Working paper, University of Akron. Moussu, C., Ohana, S., 2016. Do leveraged firms underinvest in corporate social responsibility? Evidence from health and safety programs in U.S.firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 135 (4), 715-729. Mao, C. X., Weathers, J., 2019. Employee treatment and firm innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46, (7-8), 944-976. Ning, Y., Xiao, Z., Lee, J., 2017. Shareholders and managers: Who care more about corporate diversity and employee benefits? Journal of Management and Governance, 21 (1), 93-118. Verwijmeren, P., Derwall, J., 2010. Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34 (5), 956-964. Zhang, J., Wang, J., and Kong, D., 2020. Employee treatment and corporate fraud. Economic Modelling, 85, 325-334. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-08 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-08 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.149.250.65 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-06-08 Your IP address is 3.149.250.65 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2025-06-08. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2025-06-08 |
QR Code |