一天二十四小時裡，一般上班族至少有三分之一的時間，必須待在辦公室（職場），長時間的相處，自然有機會發展情感的可能性，然而許多組織因擔心辦公室戀情可能造成工作績效、組織氣氛、戀情結束後可能造成離職等影響，因而採成文或不成文的禁止辦公室戀政策，然而相關辦公室戀情政策，對於員工自主的權利是否產生影響，值得探討。且現今組織發展，人力資源為不可或缺的重要條件，如何提升員工工作滿意度，進而減低離職率，為組織保留人才，提供未來發展能量，乃近來組織管理的重要議題。本次研究希望藉由員工知覺組織政策支持辦公室戀情，進而使員工感受擁有自主性，進而提升工作滿意度，提供組織擬定政策參考。
本研究對象為18歲以上就業中上班族，並施以問卷方式蒐集資料，回收有效問卷數320份，使用辦公室戀情組織知覺量表、員工自主性量表、工作滿意度量表作為研究工具，經資料整理，使用統計軟體IBM SPSS 22執行敘述性統計分析與信度分析，另使用MPLUS 6執行驗證性因素分析。於資料分析時，依卡方檢定、比較擬合指數(CFI)、塔克劉易斯指數(TLI)、平均概似平方根誤差係數(RMSEA)與標準化均方根殘差值(SRMR)為分析指標。
研究結果發現：
1. 辦公室戀情組織政策支持與員工自主性成正相關。
2. 員工自主性與工作滿意度成正相關。
3. 辦公室戀情組織政策支持對於工作滿意度沒有顯著的直接效果。
4. 辦公室戀情組織政策支持於員工自主性中介效果下，與工作滿意度成正相關。

People spend almost one-third of the day in their workplace. Employees who work together might develop romantic feelings and create office romance.
Unfortunately, most organizations would not permit workplace romance partly because possible work performance decline and negative moral generation. When workplace romance doesn’t work out, which could lead to a high turnover rate. Some organizations expressively prohibit workplace romance and state the prohibition in the contract.
Nowadays organizations recognize the importance of human resource and focus on employees’ job satisfaction in order to reduce the turnover rate and thus employ high-quality human resource in the organization.
The study examined the relationship between organization support of workplace romance and job satisfaction through a mediating role, autonomy in workplace. Participants are full-time workers aged 18 or older. Data were collected via a questionnaire, including workplace romance organizational awareness scale, the employee autonomy scale and the job satisfaction scale. Data were analyzed by using IBM SPSS 22 and Mplus6, including descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlation, reliability, structural equation modeling.
The results showed: (1) workplace romance organization policy support was positively related to employee autonomy; (2) employee autonomy was positively related to job satisfaction; (3) workplace romance organization policy support did not have a direct effect on job satisfaction; (4) employee autonomy mediated the relationship between workplace romance organization policy support and job satisfaction.
Keywords: Workplace Romance, Employee Autonomy, Job Satisfaction.

論文審定書 ……………………………………………………… i
誌謝 …………………………………………………………… ii
中文摘要…………………………………………………………… iii
英文摘要…………………………………………………………… iv
表次 …………………………………………………………… vii
圖次 …………………………………………………………… vx
第 一 章 緒論………………………………………………………1
第一節 前言………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究動機………………………………………………3
第三節 研究目的………………………………………………5
第 二 章 文獻探討……………………………………………...6
第一節 辦公室戀情組織政策支持……………….….6
第二節 員工自主性…………………………………………13
第三節 員工工作滿意度…………………………………15
第四節 辦公室戀情組織政策支持、員工自主性、員工工作滿意度之關係………………………………………………17
第 三 章 研究方法………………………………………….…19
第一節 研究架構………………………………………….…19
第二節 研究假設…………………………………….………20
第三節 研究樣本…………………………………….………21
第四節 研究工具…………………………………….………22
第五節 研究程序………………………………….…………27
第六節 共同方法變異之檢測與說明…….………28
第 四 章 研究結果…………………………………….………29
第一節 辦公室戀情組織政策支持、員工自主性、員工工作滿意度之現況……………………………….…..…………29
第二節 辦公室戀情組織支持、員工自主性、員工工作滿意度之人口變項上之差異………………………………31
第三節 相關係數分析…………………………….………34
第四節 結構方程式模式分析………………….…….35
第五節 假設結果檢定………………………….…………38
第 五 章 討論與建議………………………….….…………39
第一節 結論與討論……………………………….….……39
第二節 管理意涵…………………………………….………41
第三節 研究限制與未來建議………..…….………..43
參考文獻………………………………………………….…………45
附錄一 問卷…………………………………………….………..49

一、中文文獻參考
王郁智、章淑娟、朱正一(2006)。升遷機會、 社會支持、工作滿意度與留任意願之相關性研究。志為護理，5(4)，90-99
彭光台、高月慈、林钲棽(民95)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測適和補救。管理學報，23，77-98。
彭于萍(2013)。大學圖書館館員領導者與成員交換關係、工作自主性及組織公民行為之關係模式探悉。教育資料與圖書館學，50:4，491-525。
游舜瑜(2011)。職場戀情、員工互動與組織公民行為之研究。中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理學系碩士論文，台北市。
葉怡妏(2011)。職場戀情、員工互動與角色內行為之研究。中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理學系碩士論文，台北市。
賴苡汝、廖梨伶、謝籃琪、李貞慧(2014)。台灣營養師工作壓力、工作滿意度、職業倦怠和離職傾向之現況與相關性。台灣衛誌，33(6)，609-619。
二、英文文獻參考
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of Self-determination research. New York, NY: University of Rochester.
Devine, I., & Markiewicz, D. (1990). Cross-sex relationship at work and the impact of gender stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4), 333-338.
Dillard, J. P. (1987). Close relationships at work: Perceptions of the motive and performance of relational participants. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 4(2),179-193.
Dillard, J., Hale, j. l., & Segrin, C. (1994). Close relationships in task environments: Perceptions of Relational Types, Illicitness, and Power, Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 227-255.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Katherine A. Karl & Cynthia L.Sutton “An Examination of the Perceived Fairness of Workplace Romance Policies” Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 429-442
Lickey N. C., Berry G. R., & Whelan-Berry K. S. (2009). Responding to Workplace Romance: A Proactive and Pragmatic Approach. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 8(1), 100-119.
Karl, K. A., & C. L. Sutton (2000). An Examination of the Perceived Fairness of Workplace Romance Policies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 429-442.
Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A., & Patrick, H. (2005). Self-determination and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 997–1009.
Koestner, R., Bernieri, F., & Zuckerman, M. (1992). Self-regulation and consistency between attitudes, traits, and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 52-59.
La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367-384.
Lickey Nolan C., Berry Gregory R., & Whelan-Berry S. Karen (2009). Responding to Workplace Romance: A Proactive and Pragmatic Approach. The Journal of business Inquiry, 8(1), 100-119.
Nathan A. Bowling & Gregory D. Hammond (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 63-77.
Powers, D. M. (1999). The Office Romance: Playing with Fire without Getting Burned. New York: American Management Association
Powell, G. N. (1986). What do tomorrow’s managers think about sexual intimacy in the workplace? Business Horizons, 29(4), 30–5.
Powell, G. N.& S. Foley, (1998).“Something to talk about: Romantic relationships in organizational settings.” Journal of Management, 24, 421-448.
Pritchard, R. D., & Karasick, B. W. (1973). The effect of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(1), 126-46.
Quinn, R. E.(1977). “Coping with Cupid: The formation, impact and management of romantic relationships in organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 39-45.
Riach, K. & Wilson, F.(2007). Don’t screw the crew: Exploring the rules of engagement in organizational romance. British of Management, 18, 79-92.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Sternberg, R. J.(1986). “A Triangular theory of love.” Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
Vansteenkiste M., Neyrinck B., Christopher P. Niemiec, Soenens B., Hans De Witte and Anja Van den Broeck (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 251-277.