論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
產品置入於網紅影音內容的廣告效果研究 Research on Advertising Effects of Product Placement in Internet Influencers’ Video Content |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
111 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-02-21 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-03-05 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
網紅、業配文、解釋水平理論、廣告內容認知、廣告互動性、廣告效果 interactive advertising, advertising effectiveness, advertising cognition, construal level theory, product replacement, Internet Influencers |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5846 次,被下載 2 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5846 times, has been downloaded 2 times. |
中文摘要 |
2016年被譽為網路直播元年,各式直播節目、平台、以及網紅有如百家爭鳴般席捲而來,但怎樣才能成為網紅?「網紅」延續以往在部落格的行銷手法,透過網路向粉絲進行產品的推薦或者使用心得的分享,推薦形式多元靈活,如軟性文章、影音內容、直播分享的方式來與追隨者接觸。在台灣,數位廣告預估已成為主流廣告的投放形式,「產品置入」也在其中被廣為應用,然而國內外針對此一行銷手法使用於社群媒體,特別是網紅影音內容中的運用方式及其傳播溝通效果的相關研究仍不多見。鑑此,本研究將探討網紅影音內容中,產品置入形式的不同對於廣告溝通的效果為何?並結合「解釋水平理論(construal level theory)」,深究影音內容中不同構面的廣告內容認知─資訊性、娛樂性和互動性,如何藉由改變消費者的解釋水平,而干擾置入形式的相對效果。 本研究實驗設計採用2(置入產品:衛生棉(條) vs. 筆記型電腦)x9(影片)的二因子受測者間實驗設計,所有的變數將請受測者觀看影片後,透過衡量方式得知,如此可掌握每一位受測者個別對於置入顯著性、廣告內容認知的評判,而選用兩種不同類型產品,可增加研究結果的概化性。研究發現:在網紅製作的影音內容中,廣告內容認知會影響消費者建構水平,而置入顯著度、影片的娛樂性、資訊性、互動性都可以提升受測者對於所置入產品的產品態度和購買意願,更重要的是,廣告內容認知會干擾置入顯著度對於產品態度和購買意願的影響。研究結果能為網紅業配、廣告內容認知、解釋水平理論等範疇,提供學術上的意涵,並可供業者作為影音內容置入之參考。 |
Abstract |
The year, 2016, is known as the starting year of live streaming era, and various live streaming channels, platforms and internet influencers have popped up since that year. Those so-called “micro-celebrities” continue the marketing strategies once applied in the blog era, and promote the products to and share usage experiences with public via the Internet. The ways of sharing and promoting products vary, such as through soft articles, videos filming, and live streaming in order to speak to the followers directly. In Taiwan, digital advertising is expected to be the primary form of advertising. Embedded advertising has actually been applied as one of the marketing strategies. However, there are few studies about this marketing strategy applied in the social media, especially those utilized in the videos of internet influencers and the effectiveness of communication of this kind. Accordingly, this study examines how the different forms of product placement used in the videos influence the advertising communication effects. Combined with construal level theory, this study also discusses how the dimensions of advertising cognition (informativeness, entertainment, and interactivity) moderate the relative effectiveness of placement forms by changing consumers’ construal level. This research conducted an experiment with a two-factor between-subjects design: two products (sanitary napkins and tampons vs. laptops) and nine videos. All the variables were measured after the participants watched the videos. This helped to obtain a more sensitive measure of how individuals perceived placement prominence and advertising content. The use of two products increased the generalizability of research results. The analytical results reveal that as to the content of videos made by the internet influencers, the advertising cognition dimensions influenced consumers’ construal level. Placement prominence and the entertainment, informativeness, and interactivity of the videos increased the participants’ attitudes toward and intentions to purchase the placed products. Most importantly, advertising cognition moderated how placement prominence affected attitudes towards and intentions to purchase the placed products. The research results offer the academic implications to internet influencers’ product placement, advertising cognition, and construal level theory, and provide suggestions for practitioners about how to place products in a video. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目 錄 第一章、緒論…………………………………………………………… 1 第一節、研究背景………………………………………………………………… 1 第二節、研究動機………………………………………………………………… 4 第三節、研究問題………………………………………………………………… 8 第四節、研究目的………………………………………………………………… 8 第 二 章、文獻探討…………………………………………………… 9 第一節、網紅……………………………………………………………………… 9 第二節、廣告內容認知…………………………………………………………… 11 第三節、業配文…………………………………………………………………… 16 第四節、解釋水平理論與社會距離……………………………………………… 17 第五節、廣告效果………………………………………………………………… 19 第 三 章、研究架構與研究假說……………………………………… 21 第一節、研究架構………………………………………………………………… 21 第二節、研究假說………………………………………………………………… 22 第 四 章、研究方法…………………………………………………… 27 第一節、樣本與實驗設計………………………………………………………… 27 第二節、實驗刺激………………………………………………………………… 30 第三節、實驗程序………………………………………………………………… 34 第四節、變數衡量………………………………………………………………… 35 第五節、研究結果………………………………………………………………… 38 第 五 章、結論與建議………………………………………………… 57 第一節、主要研究發現…………………………………………………………… 57 第二節、理論與實務意涵………………………………………………………… 60 第三節、研究限制與未來研究方向……………………………………………… 63 參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………… 65 附錄………………………………………………………………………………… 87 |
參考文獻 References |
中文文獻: 1. 【台灣YouTuber Top 50名單】2017年第四季揭曉:這群人、蔡阿嘎、阿神位居前3名(Smart M)。https://www.smartm.com.tw/article/34323538cea3 2. 2016網紅生態白皮書(艾瑞諮詢)。 3. DMA發布2016全年數位廣告量(動腦雜誌)。http://www.brain.com.tw/news/articlecontent?ID=44757 4. 人人是媒體的時代,你的媒體原則是什麼?(Mr.jamie) http://mrjamie.cc/2013/07/23/media-principles/ 5. 卜小蝶、張映涵(2012)。網路影音休閒之遊歷型為探討。圖書資訊學刊,10(2),39-74。 6. 王小惠、林雨岑(2013)。資訊型行動應用對廣告效果的影響:以IKEA Apps為例,資訊傳播研究(3:2),25-46。 7. 王毓莉(2005)。政府運用置入性行銷從事菸害防制工作之初探性研究,中華傳播學刊,8,115-159。 8. 台灣《YouTube使用者行為大調查》揭密最新影音趨勢(GOOGLE台灣-官方部落格)https://taiwan.googleblog.com/2017/10/youtube.html。 9. 用台灣民眾網路使用狀態,窺視 2018 行銷方向(潮網科技) https://www.wavenet.com.tw/2018/01/%E7%94%A8%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%B0%91%E7%9C%BE%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%EF%BC%8C%E7%AA%BA%E8%A6%96-2018-%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91/。 10. 田中洋、丸岡吉人(1999)。新廣告心裡學(Advertising psychology)(蔡昆霖譯)。台北:朝陽堂文化,(原作1993年出版)。 11. 伊慶春、章英華(2006)。對娶外籍與大陸媳婦的態度:社會接觸的重要性,台灣社會學,12,191-232。 12. 朱曉幸(1997)。理性及感性訴求方式在不同產品涉入程度下的比較廣告效果,交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 13. 江義平、謝昌明(2013)。網路媒體置入性行銷效果研究,電子商務研究,11(2),175-194。 14. 池文海、吳鈺萍、謝郁萍,2016。從情感與認知評價之雙面觀點探討網路影音平台使用者行為,管理學報,33(3),443-471。 15. 行銷2018年必須注意的十個行銷趨勢(哈佛商業評論) https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0007718.html 16. 吳建鴻、蕭裕憲(2008)。社群網路影音分享平台,電腦與通訊,125,101-107。 17. 李慶章、余心馨(2007)。多媒體行動廣告價值之研究,第十八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集,台北,台灣。 18. 周軒逸、練乃華 (2012)。當簡訊遇上前導:品牌熟悉度、互動性、個人化、誘因之好奇效果。臺大管理論叢,23(1),239-268。 19. 林育昇(2011)。商業性置入式行銷新聞的第三人效果,http://ccur.lib.ccu.edu.tw/handle/A095B0000Q/1901 20. 林承賢(2014)。近五年來台灣傳播學界博碩士論文使用網路問卷研究方法之後設分析,資訊社會研究,6,25-58。 21. 林照真(2005)。“置入性行銷”:新聞與廣告倫理的雙重崩壞,中華傳播學刊,8,27-40。 22. 林照真(2011)。新瓶裝「假」酒?:有關新媒體置入性行銷的分析與批判,中華傳播學刊,20,95-114。 23. 林耀南、陳柏佑、林介中(2010)。幽默廣告類型對廣告態度之影響-以比較式廣告與廣告訴求為干擾變項,萬能商學學報,15,213-231。 24. 胡幼偉(1997)。選舉新聞的第三者效果,中華傳播學會,1(7)。 25. 徐振興(2004)。產品置入電視戲劇節目與其行銷溝通效果之研究,http://ir.lib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/439。 26. 徐振興、黃甄玉(2005)。產品訊息疑似置入電視偶像劇之研究,中華傳播學刊,8,65-114。 27. 祝鳳岡(1995)。廣告感性訴求策略之策略分析,廣告學研究,5,85-112。 28. 耿慶瑞、劉凱銘、黃增隆(2006)。互動廣告對經驗產品屬性轉換之研究,電子商務學報,8(1),101-128。 29. 張玉佩(2011)。線上遊戲之閱聽人愉悅經驗探索,中華傳播學刊,19,61-95。 30. 從來源可信度(Source Credibility)看口碑行銷的實踐(i-Buzz網路口碑研究中心) http://i-buzzresearchcenter.blogspot.tw/2010/11/source-credibility.html。 31. 曹文瑜、林政坤、楊惠貞(2007)。影響網路直播持續收看意圖相關因素之研究,企業管理學報,(81),105-128。 32. 曹君逸(2005)。雜誌置入式行銷效果研究:閱聽人涉入度和置入情境適切性之探討。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 33. 許安琪、樊志育(2002)。廣告學原理,台北:揚智。 34. 陳亭羽、陳美慧、朱雅筠,2006,〈多媒體簡訊特性對廣告價值與廣告效果之影響研究〉,《行銷評論》,3(3): 279-310。 35. 陳炳宏(2005)。探討廣告商介入電視新聞產製之新聞廣告化現象:兼論置入性行銷與新聞專業自主,中華傳播學刊,(8),209-246。 36. 陳純德、陳美如(2014)。部落客意見領袖信任轉移影響之研究:推敲可能性模式觀點,Journal of -Business,(16-3),247~276。 37. 創市際雙週刊第七十一期 20160919(創市際市場研究顧問)http://www.ixresearch.com/reports/%E5%89%B5%E5%B8%82%E9%9A%9B%E9%9B%99%E9%80%B1%E5%88%8A%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%83%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80%E6%9C%9F-20160919/。 38. 無所不在的「置入性行銷」,是助力還是阻力?(科技報橘) https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2016/10/07/ncc-tv-programme-sponsors/。 39. 黃子佼、羅振宇:談網紅,先玩玩看再說(遠見雜誌) https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=35309。 40. 黃子潔、賴建都(2008)。部落格廣告以代言人表現模式之溝通效果研究,廣告學研究(30),1-33。 41. 黃國師(2008)。置入性行銷是電視媒體的甜點還是雞肋?,中華傳播學刊,(8),17-25。 42. 黃競樺(2010)。2010行動廣告效益指標調查―數位媒體溝通效果超越傳統,LBS和消費者主動索取的行動廣告價值高,資策會FIND網站,取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=manyandid=261。 43. 楊秀敏(2004)。線上遊戲產品置入傳播效果研究:以線上遊戲創作kuso 世代為例。政治大學廣告學系研究所碩士論文。 44. 楊運秀、郭芳伃(2017)。網紅業配文的說服效果:懷疑人格、熟悉度及專業性的影響,行銷評論,14(2),163-189。 45. 廖淑君(2006)。政府從事電視置入性行銷法律規範之研究,廣告學研究,26,83-107。 46. 網路業配文要先說清楚講明白嗎?(ETtoday新聞雲) https://www.ettoday.net/news/20171012/1029965.htm。 47. 數位廣告成長快,已成13國主流廣告投放形式(數位時代)。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/40932/digitalad-carat。 48. 劉宜芬(2012)。廣告對產品線外溢效果之影響:廣告策略、品牌聯想與屬性呈現之角色,管理學報,29(6),539-557 49. 蔡易靜(2015)。台灣有超過580萬人使用寬頻數位影音服務-數位影音市集商機浮現。資策會FIND網站。 50. 蔡瑤昇、呂文琴、洪榮照(2011)。網路意見領袖量表之建構,Journalof-Business(13-4),759-790。 51. 蔡璧如、吳穎帆、莊苑仙(2014)。網路互動性對網路口碑之影響,高雄應用科技大學2014第六屆管理創新與行銷專案研討會,952-963。 52. 謝清文,2017,廣告置入特性對品牌產品和節目平台之影響-以中國新歌聲為例,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。 53. 鄭自隆,2008。電視置入:形式、效果與倫理。台北縣:正中書局股份有限公司。 54. 黎士鳴、翁嘉英(2004)。照顧者知覺患者疾病特性對其社會距離與照顧行為的影響,中華心理衛生學刊,17(3) ,57-74。 55. 賴明弘、張峻維(2016)。網路影音直播平台的使用者行為探討:從知曉到持續使用,中科大學報,3(1),31-48。 56. 賴明政、鄭厚謙(2017)。你相信網紅嗎?網紅推薦口碑說服效果http://cmr.crrmkt.pccu.edu.tw/bin/downloadfile.php?file=WVhSMFlXTm9MelF3TDNCMFlWOHlNRFJmTlRBME5qRXlYelE1T0RFMExuQmtaZz09andfname=KLRPST45WXB5NPOPKL31DG55HDZXCHEHSXRPEH4145QPZXQP15B53155RLML45STA5EDCDPKGHOPB5CHCDMLED5515JHKP40SXEDDG50KLJHFHB5CD31GDA5SXFDCDUT45A5JHUX45UTVTEH51VT51VXUTFDKLEDJDVTVTOPSXUTVT4551B531B5CDOPID50A501QLPK35QP01CH51FD3155IHOP05EH14EDJDA5SXYXZX55EDSTHC5515VT11CH15EDFDOPUXQP50EHEDOPED4545OPKPQPSXEDWTUXKLQPZXB5RLED14VXRLRPMPB1。 57. 羅文輝、劉蕙苓(2006)。置入性行銷對新聞記者的影響,新聞學研究,89,81-125。 58. 羅順年、林清同(2012)。置入性廣告對網路社群遊戲玩家行為意向之研究, http://ir.dyu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/5705。 英文文獻: 1. Aarseth, E. (2006). The culture and business of cross-media productions. Popular Communication, 4(3), 203-211. 2. Acar, A., 2007, Testing the effects of incidental advertising exposure in online gaming environment, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(1), 45-56. 3. Aggarwal, P., and Zhao, M. (2015). Seeing the big picture: the effect of height on the level of construal. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(1), 120-133. 4. Aparna A., and Vanessa M. Patrick (2009), Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture, Journal of Consumer Research,35(5),800-809. 5. Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233-248. 6. Bambauer-Sachse, S., and Mmangold, S. (2013). Do consumers still believe what is said in online product reviews? A persuasion knowledge approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(4), 373-381. 7. Ben Lewism, L. P., (2010).In-game advertising effects: Examining player perceptions of advertising scheme congruity in a massive multiplayer online role playing game, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 46-60. 8. Bezjian-Avery, Alexandra M. (1997). Coginitive processing of interactive marketing, unpublished doctoral dissertation, northwestern university, evanston,illinois. 9. Bosshart, L., and Macconi, I. (1998). Defining entertainment. Communication Research Trends, 18(3), 3-6. 10. Brackett, Lana K. and Benjamin N. Carr, Jr, (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs. Other media: consumer vs. Mature student attitude. Journal of Advertising Research, 23-32. 11. Veroline Cauberghe (UGent) and Patrick De Pelsmacker ,(2010). Advergames: the impact of brand prominence and game repetition on brand responses, Journal of Advertising,39(1), 5-18. 12. Cauberghe, V. and De Pelsmackere , P ,(2010).Advergames the impact of brand prominence and game repetition on brand responses.Journal of Advertising,39(1),5-18. 13. Chen, R., Xu, X., and Shen, H ,(2017). Go beyond just paying: effects of payment method on level of construal. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(2), 207-217. 14. Cheng, J. M. S., Blankson, C., Wang, E. S. T. and Chen, L. S. L. (2009). Consumer attitudes and interactive digital advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 501-525. 15. Choi, Y. Y., Seo, Y. and Yoon, S., (2017). E-wom messaging on social media: Social ties, temporal distance and message concreteness. Internet Research, 27(3), 495-505. 16. Chung, S. and Park, J., (2017). Exploring consumer evaluations in social media: The role of psychological distance between company and consumer. Computers In Human Behavior, 76, 312-320. 17. Chiang, I. P., Lo, S. H. and Wang, L. H., (2017). Customer engagement behaviour in social media advertising: antecedents and consequences. Contemporary Management Research, 13(3), 193-216. 18. Cowley, E. and Barron, C.,(2008). When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89-98. 19. Cowley, E. and Barron , C.,(2008).When product placement goes wrong:The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising ,37(1),89-98. 20. D’Hooge, S. C., Hudders, L. and Cauberghe, V., (2017). Direct evaluative conditioning in brand placement: The impact of scene valence and prominence on brand placement repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 16,452-462 . 21. Davidson, E. and Vaast, E., (2009). Tech talk: An investigation of blogging in technology innovation discourse. Ieee Transactions on Professional Communication,52(1),40-60. 22. Ducoffe, R. H., (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Current Issues And Research in Advertising, 17(1), 1-18. 23. Ducoff, R. H., (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Advertising Research ,36(5),21-36. 24. Enginkaya, E. and Yılmaz, H.,(2014). What drives consumers to interact with brands through social media? A motivation scale development study. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 148, 219-226. 25. Falkow, S.,(2010). Pr trends 2010: Branded content. The Proactive Report. http://proactivereport.com/pr-trends-2010-branded-content/ 26. Ferguson, N. S. and Burkhalter, J. N.,(2015). Yo, Dj, That’s my brand: An examination of consumer response to brand placements in hip-hop music. Journal of Advertising, 44(1), 47-57. 27. Friestad, M. and Wright, P.,(1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31. 28. Gamson, J. (2011). The unwatched life is not worth living: The elevation of the ordinary in celebrity culture. Pmla, 126(4)1061-1069. 29. Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M. and Watson, R. T.,(2006). The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69-80. 30. Gem Geuens, P De Pelsmacker,(2017).Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design, Journal of Advertising,46(1),83-100. 31. Gilmore, J. H. and Pine, B. J.,(2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston, ma: Harvard Business School Press. 32. Gupta, P. B. and Lord, K. R., (1998).Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of Current Issues And Research in Advertising, 20(1), 48-59. 33. Haghirian, P., Madlberger, M. and Tanuskova, A., (2005,). Increasing advertising value of mobile marketing-an empirical study of antecedents. HICSS '05 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,1(1), 32.3. 34. Han, D., Duhachek, A., Agrawal, N., (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1047-1064. 35. Hartmann, T. and Goldhoorn, C., (2011). Horton and wohl revisited: Exploring viewers' experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121. 36. Hayes, A.F., (2018), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd edition), Guilford Press. 37. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P., (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68. 38. Huettl, V. and Gierl, H., (2012). Visual art in advertising: The effects of utilitarian vs. Hedonic product positioning and price information. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 893-904. 39. Huntsinge, J. R., Clore, G. L. and Isbell, L. M., (2014). The affective control of thought : Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121, 600–618. 40. Hutcheon, L., (2006). A theory of adaptation. London, uk: Routledge.jauss, h. R., and benzinger, e. (1970). Literary history as a challenge to litrerary theory.new literary history, 2(1), 7-37. 41. Jenkins, H., (2006). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New york university press. 42. Jin, S.-A. A. and Phua, J., (2014). Following celebrities‟ Tweets about brands: The impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers‟ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-195. 43. Kamins, Ma, Marks, Lj and Skinner, D., (1991). Television commercial evaluation in the context of program induced mood:Congruency versus consistency effects. Journal of Advertising,20(2),1-14. 44. Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L. and Kim, J., (2006). Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 135-144. 45. Kyuha Kim, Sungmi Leeb, Yung Kyun Choia., (2017). Image proximity in advertising appeals: Spatial distance and product types. Journal of Business Research, Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017. 46. Ko, H. C. and Wu, W. N., (2017). Exploring the determinants of viewers' loyalty toward beauty youtubers: a parasocial interaction perspective. 2017 international conference on education and multimedia technology ,81-86. 47. Kotler, P.,(1995). Marketing management:Analysis, Planning , Implementation, and Control . Englewood cliffs, nj: prentice-hall. 48. Kotler, P. and Armstrong, (1995). Principles of marketing, englewood cliffs. In.n.j.: prentice hall. 49. Lee, Hyojin, Xiaoyan Deng, H. Rao Unnava, and Kentaro Fujita., (2014). Monochrome forests and colorful trees: The effect of black-and-white versus color imagery on construal level. Journal of Consumer Research ,41(4),1015-1032. 50. Lee,J., (2015). Consumer evaluation: Describing construal-level theory and a role of emotion on human’s thinking processing style. Master’s theses, loyola university chicago. 51. Lee, L. and Tsai, C. I., (2014). How price promotions influence postpurchase consumption experience over time. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 943-959. 52. Lee, M. and Faber, R.J., (2007), Effects of product placement in on-line games on brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention, Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 75-90. 53. Lehu, J. M. and Bressoud, É., (2009). Recall of brand placement in movies: Interactions between prominence and plot connection in real conditions of exposure. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing, 24(1), 7-26. 54. Lemanski, Jennifer L. and Hyung-Seok Lee, (2012). Attitude certainty and resistance to persuasion: Investigating the impact of source trustworthiness in advertising. International Journal of Business And Social Science, 3(1),66-75. 55. Leventhal, H. and Mace, W., (1970). The effect of laughter on evaluation of a slapstick movie. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 38, 16-30. 56. Levinson, P., (2009). New new media. Boston: Allyn and bacon. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1931243110390338 57. Li, F. and Du, T. C., (2011). Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs. Decision Support System, 51(1), 190-197. 58. Li, R., (2018). The secret of internet celebrities: A qualitative study of online opinion leaders on weibo. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 59. Liberman, N. and Trope, Y., (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18. 60. Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. and Trope, Y., (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523-534. 61. Liu, Y. and Shrum, L.J., (2009). A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 53-68. 62. Mckenzie, S. B. and Lutz, J. L.,(1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude towards the ad in an advertising pretesting context, Journal of Marketing ,53, 48 - 65. 63. Mcmillan, Sally J. (2002), Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems,In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping And Consequences of Icts, 163-182. 64. Meirick, P. C., (2005). Rethinking the target corollary the effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32 (6), 822-843. 65. Mitchell, . A. and Olson, J. C., (1981) .Are product attitude beliefs the onlymediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?,Journal of Marketingresearch, 18,318-332. 66. Neer, K.,(2004). How product placement works. Retrieved november 20,2005, https://money.howstuffworks.com/product-placement.htm. 67. Newhagen, J. E. and Rafaeli, S., (1996). Why communication research should study the internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 4-13. 68. Nussbaum, Shiri, Yaacov Trope, and Nira Liberman, (2003). Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology,84(3),485-97. 69. Ogutu , R.P., Ogutu M. and Njanja, L., (2014).The effect of internet advertising on attitude towards internet advertising of university students in kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences And Entrepreneurship.3 (1), 38-76. 70. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184. 71. Pyone, Jin Seok and Alice M. Isen (2011). Positive affect, intertemporal choice, and levels of thinking: Increasing consumers’willingness to wait. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 532-543. 72. Rafaeli, Sheizaf, (1988).Interactivity: From new media to communication,in r.hawkins, j. M. Wiermann, and s. Pingree(eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Bervely Hills, CA: Ssage. 73. Reinhard, Messner and Sporer, (2006). Explicit persuasive intent and its impact on success at persuasion - The determining roles of attractiveness and likeableness, Journal of Consumer Psychology,16(3), 249-259. 74. Rheingold, H., (1993). The virtual connunity: Finding commection in a computerized world: addison-wesley longman publishing co., inc. 75. Rotzoll, K., Haefner, J.E. and Sandage, C.J., (1989). Advertising and the classical liberal world view, in advertising in society, ntc publishing group. 76. Russell, C. A., (1998). Toward a framework of product placement: Theory propositions, Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 357-362. 77. Rubin, A.M., Perse, E.M. and Powell, R.A., (1985).Loneliness, parasocial interaction,and local television news viewing, Human Communication Research, 12, 155-180. 78. Sagarin, Brad J., Robert B. Cialdini, William E. Rice and Sherman B. Serna ,(2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion, Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 83(3),26-41. 79. Schwarz, N. and Clore G. L., (1983).Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states, Journal of Personality And Social Psychology,45(3),513-523. 80. Selnow, G.W., (1988), Using interactive computer to communicate scientific information, American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 124-135. 81. Shimp, T. A., (1981).Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice, Journal of Advertising,10(2),9-15. 82. Smith, P. K. and Trope, Y., (2006).Abstract thinking increases one's sense of power, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,44,378-385. 83. So, J. and Nabi, R., (2013). Reduction of perceived social distance as an explanation for media’s influence on personal risk perceptions: A test of the risk convergence model. Human Communication Research, 39(3),317-338. 84. So, Jiyeon and Robin Nabi, (2013). Reduction of perceived social distance as an explanation for media’s influence on personal risk perceptions: A test of the risk convergence model,Human Communication Research, 39(3),317-38. 85. Soba, M. and Aydin, M., (2013). Product placement efficiency in marketing communication strategy. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(12), 111. 86. Solomon, M. R., (2005). Consumer behavior, new jersey, NJ: Pearson Education. 87. Stephens, K. K., Barrett, A. K. and Mahometa, M. J., (2013). Organizational communication in emergencies: Using multiple channels and sources to combat noise and capture attention. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 230-251. 88. Steuer, J., (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence, Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. 89. Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G. and Kuntaraporn, M., (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse):An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104-1127. 90. Thorson, K. S. and Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as ewom and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 5-44. 91. Tormala, Zakary L., Joshua J. Clarkson and Richard E. Petty, (2006). Resisting persuasion by the skin of one’s teeth: The hidden success of resisted persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3),423-435. 92. Trope, Y. and Liberman, N., (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889. 93. Trope, Y. and Liberman, N., (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421. 94. Trope, Y., Liberman, N. and Wakslak, C., (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95. 95. Trope, Yaacov and Nira Liberman., 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Psychological Review ,117(2),440-463. 96. Tsang, M. M., Ho, S. C. and Liang, T. P., (2004). Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 65-78. 97. Tugrul, T. O. and Lee, E. M., (2018). Promoting charitable donation campaigns on social media. The Service Industries Journal, 38(3-4), 149-163. 98. Tumasjan, Andranik, Maria Strobel and Isabell Welpe, (2011). Ethical leadership evaluations after moral transgression: Social distance makes the difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4),609-22. 99. Vallacher, Robin R. and Daniel M. Wegner, (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 4:660-71. 100. Van Kerckhove, Anneleen, Maggie Geuens and Iris Vermeir, (2015). The floor is nearer than the sky: How looking up or down affects construal level. Journal of Consumer Research ,41(6),1358-1371. 101. Van Reijmersdal, E., (2009). Brand placement prominence: Good for memory! Bad for attitudes? Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 151-153. 102. Vashisht, D. and Pillai, S. S., (2017). Are you able to recall the brand? The impact of brand prominence, game involvement and persuasion knowledge in online-advergames. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 26(4), 402-414. 103. Victoria Mazzella, (2016).The micro-celebrity economy:How influencers impact the restaurant industry. Capstone in DCIM. 104. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C. and Ritterfeld, U., (2004). Enjoyment: at the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388-408. 105. Wei, H. and Wang, L., (2016). Study on media marketing under “internet+” background: internet celebrity economy. Management Science and Engineering, 5(4),221-226. 106. Well, William, John Burnett and Sandra Moriarty, (1992). Advertising principles and practice, englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 107. Wells, W., Moriarty, S. and Burnett, J.,(2006). Advertising: principles and practice (7th ed.). Upper saddle river, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 108. Wertime ,K.F.,Ian,John Wiley and sons Inc.,(2008).Digimarketing:The essential guide to new media and new digital marketing,John Wileyandsons Inc. 109. Williams, K., Petrosky, A., Hernandez, E. and Page, R., (2011).Product placement effectiveness: Revisited and renewed, Journal of Management And Marketing Research,7(1), 1-24. 110. Wu, G., (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring the perceived interactivity of websites. Journal of Current Issues And Research In Advertising, 28(1), 87-104. 111. Yaakop, A., Mohamed Anuar, M., Omar, K. and Liaw, A., (2012).Consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards advertising on facebook in malaysia. World Business and Economics Research Conference, Auckland New Zealand. 112. Yagci, M. I., Biswas, A. and Dutta, S., (2009). Effects of comparative advertising format on consumer responses: The moderating effects of brand image and attribute relevance. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 768-774. 113. Yoo, C. Y. and Kim, K., (2005). Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 18-34. 114. Young, G., (2004). From broadcasting to narrowcasting to ‘mycasting’: A newfound celebrity in queer internet communities. Continuum, 18(1), 43-62. 115. Zhao, Min and Jinhong Xie, (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3),86-96. 116. Zillmann, D. and Bryant, J., (1994). Entertainment as media effect. Media Effects: Advances In Theory And Research, 437-461. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |