論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
工作自主性與員工幸福感之關係研究-以工作生活平衡為中介變項 Examining the relationship among work autonomy and employee happiness: the work-life balance as the mediating factor |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
45 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-01-11 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-01-18 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
工作-個人生活提升、個人生活介入工作、工作介入個人生活、工作生活平衡、員工幸福感、工作自主性 work interference with personal life, work/personal life enhancement, personal life interference with work, work-life balance, employee happiness, work autonomy |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5806 次,被下載 6 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5806 times, has been downloaded 6 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究的主要目的為探討工作自主性與員工幸福感之間的關係,並探討工作生活平衡的中介效果,研究對象包含傳統製造業、金融保險業、科技業、服務業、營造建築業、醫療產業及其他未分類之台灣產業的在職員工。 本研究問卷採以網路問卷形式來進行。最後在收回的173份樣本中篩除無效樣本後,計有效樣本數為158份,主要使用階層線性迴歸分析做為各項假設之驗證。 本研究主要使用階層線性迴歸分析來進行研究假說之驗證。經由實證分析,本研究分析結果如下: H1:工作自主性會正向影響員工幸福感,假設獲得支持。 H2:工作自主性會正向影響工作生活平衡,假設獲得部份支持。 H3:工作生活平衡會正向影響對員工幸福感,假設獲得部份支持。 H4:工作生活平衡在工作自主性與員工幸福感具有中介效果,假設獲得部份支持。 |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between work autonomy and employee happiness, and investigate the work-life balance mediating effect. The object of study contains the manufacturing industry, the financial insurance business, the information science and technology industry, service industry, the education academic industry, the building architecture industry, and each kind employees of industries in Taiwan. This research questionnaire picks by the network questionnaire form carries on, and the effective sample number is 158 samples. This research mainly uses the stratum linearity regression analysis to confirm each supposition. The findings are as follows: H1: Work autonomy has a significantly positive influence on employee happiness. H2: Work autonomy has a positive influence on work-life balance. H3: Work-life balance has a positive influence on employee happiness. H4: Work-life balance is partly mediated between work autonomy and employee happiness. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 2 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 工作自主性(WORK AUTONOMY) 4 第二節 員工幸福感(EMPLOYEE HAPPINESS) 5 第三節 工作生活平衡(WORK-LIFE BALANCE) 7 第三章 研究方法 9 第一節 研究架構與假設 9 第二節 研究樣本與研究變項之操作 9 第三節 樣本回收與資料分析 13 第四節 資料分析方法 16 第四章 研究結果 17 第一節 敘述性統計與相關分析 17 第二節 變項間之關係檢定 20 第三節 工作生活平衡之中介效果 24 第五章 結論與建議 26 第一節 研究結果 26 第二節 研究建議 27 第三節 研究限制 28 參考文獻 30 附錄 研究調查問卷 34 |
參考文獻 References |
一、中文部份 施建彬(1994)。幸福感來源與相關因素之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣高雄醫學大學行為科學,高雄市。1-124。 陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。 劉仲矩、龍韋如(2015)。情緒假知覺與幸福感之關聯研究:工作壓力為干擾效果。中華管理評論國際學報,18(2),1-25。 陳以亨(2001)。從人力資源管理探討工作中衝突和家庭衝突與工作滿意度,國科會研究報告(編號: NSC89-2416-H100-071) 景家威(2014)。工作生活平衡與幸福感之研究:以青年民航空勤組員為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部份 Argyle, M. (2013). The psychology of happiness.London: Routledge. Aryee, S., Srinivas, E., & Tan, H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132-146. Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R & D Lab. Human Resource Management, 24, 129-146. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551-570.doi: 10.1177/001872678503800604 Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/life balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. Edward, L. Deci., & Richard, M. Ryan.(2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health .Canadian Psychological Association, 49( 3), 182–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801 Feldstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., & Walter, S. (2002). Opportunities to work at home in the context of work-life balance. Human Resource Management Journal, 12, 54-76. Friedman, D. (1998). Survey of Work/Life Initiatives. New York: Bright Horizons. Greenhaus, J., & Beutell, N. (1985). Soures of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76-88. Hackman, J. R.,& Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 86-256. Hackman, J. R.,& Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279. Hayman, J. (2005). Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management,13(1), 85-91. Kirchmeyer, C. (2000). Work-life initiatives: greed or benevolence regarding workers’ time? Trends in organizational behavior,7, 79-94. Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents o self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199-214. Losocco, K. A. (1989). The interplay of Personal and Job Characteristics in Determining Work Commitment.Social Science Research, 18, 370-394. Lu, J.G., Brockner, J., Vardi, Y., & Weitz. E. (2017). The dark side of experiencing job autonomy: Unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 222–234.doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.007 Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 181-187.doi:10.1080/00224549709595429 Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2013). Gender egalitarianism and work-life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology, DOI: 10.1111/apps.12011 Scholarios, D., & Marks, A. (2004). Work-life balance and the software worker. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(2), 54-74. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 19(11), 1005-1016. Susanti Saragih (2011). The Effects of Job Autonomy on Work Outcomes: Self Efficacy as an Intervening Variable. Business Studies,4(3),203-215.doi:10.21632/irjbs.4.3.203-215 Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2009). Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work and Stress, 23(2), 120-136. Thompson C. A., Andreassi J., & Prottas D. (2003). Work-family culture and climate. Vanhala, S., & Tuomi, K. (2006). HRM, company performance and employee well-being. Management Revue, 17(3), 241-255. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Social indicators research, 32(2), 101-160. Warr, P. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8(2), 84-97.doi: 10.1080/02678379408259982 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |