Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0115119-091122 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0115119-091122
論文名稱
Title
以平衡計分卡運用在專案管理節點分析-以國內K工程服務公司為例
A Study on Synergies of Balanced Scorecard Application in Project Management Node Analysis-- with Domestic K Engineering Service Company as an Example
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
137
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-02-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-02-15
關鍵字
Keywords
平衡計分卡、策略地圖、知識管理(KM)、工程生命週期管理(ELM)、關鍵績效指標(KPI)、專案管理(PM)
Project Management (PM), Knowledge Management (KM), Strategy Map, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM), Balanced Scorecard
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5682 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5682 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
傳統工程服務業之經營及發展,必須具有高度競爭優勢,然競爭優勢需倚賴產業內管理層級整合的能力,以及功能事業單位間之水平整合。當企業內各事業單位間整合營運及活動配合有高度的成效產生,便可成為企業競爭力的主要來源之一。在知識經濟爆量及跨國界競爭,工程服務業的演進以及新產業競爭模式,使得產業競爭型態急遽變化,必須深入了解企業現階段主要的競爭優勢為何,針對未來的競爭及我們要發展的方向,讓這些競爭優勢能為企業帶來滿意的成長與利潤。此外能在未來的競爭中勝出及順利往規劃發展方向邁進,更要建構新的競爭優勢。在具有十一個平行功能事業單位的大型工程服務公司,因為其中事業單位間的本位主義以及人員調度的抗衡與衝突,加上企業的管理部門缺乏有效的協調能力與考核方法,無法完全顯露原本具有競爭優勢所應該產生的合作綜效。
本論文以工程業之公司作為研究個案,探討個案公司在推展平衡計分卡以及繪製策略地圖的過程中,對於總公司與策略事業單位間在經營層面的影響。透過與企業管理部門和功能事業單位高階主管之訪談,實際了解個案公司現階段平衡計分卡推展現況,以及管理部門與各單位間可能產生互利或相互排擠的情形。同時並以Dr. Robert S. Kaplan與Dr. David P. Norton發表「平衡計分卡」的論點為基礎,透過管理的表現程度,來探討個案公司推展專案管理對於企業經營綜效的影響。
研究過程與結果發現,個案公司在推展平衡計分卡,確實會創造出些許經營綜效,但若要使平衡計分卡推行節點(node)管理在個案公司產生最大的實質效果,對個案公司提出的五項建議:一、要對跨產業做再深入的研究;二、改變統計問卷的方式;三、配合策略地圖的效益做實質管理;四、在平衡計分卡分析再增加構面數量;五、持續的再研究建議。
Abstract
The operation and development of the traditional engineering services industry must have a high degree of competitive advantage. However, the competitive advantage depends on the ability of the management level integration within the industry and the horizontal integration between functional institutions. When the integrated operations and activities between the various institutions in the enterprise have a high degree of effectiveness, they can become one of the main sources of competitiveness. In the explode of knowledge economy and cross-border competition, the evolution of engineering services industry and the competition mode of new industries, the industrial competition pattern is changing rapidly. It is necessary to have a deep understanding of the main competitive advantages of enterprises at this stage, aiming at the future competition and our development. The direction, so that these competitive advantages can bring satisfactory growth and profit to the enterprise. In addition, we can win in the future competition and move forward in the direction of planning and development, and we must build a new competitive advantage. In a large engineering service company with eleven parallel functional institutions, because of the localism between the business units and the counterbalance and conflict of personnel dispatch, and the lack of effective coordination and assessment methods of the management department of the enterprise, the original cannot be fully revealed. A synergy that should be generated by a competitive advantage.
This paper takes the engineering industry company as a research case to explore the impact on the management level between the head office and the strategic business unit when promoting the balanced scorecard and strategy map. Through interviews with senior executives of corporate management departments and functional organization, the situation of the company's balanced scorecards at the current stage and the relationship between corporate headquarters and strategic institutions can be actually understand. At the same time, based on the argument of Dr. Robert S. Kaplan and Dr. David P. Norton's "Balanced Scorecard", depending on degree of management, the impact of case-based company project management on the synergy of business operations is discussed.
The research found that when using a balanced scorecard the case company will actually create some business synergies. but if the case company want to get the greatest effect, The five suggestions put forward: First, to conduct further research on cross-industry; Second, change the way of statistical questionnaire; Third, to manage the effectiveness of strategic maps; Fourth, increase the number of facets in the analysis of balanced scorecards. Fifth, Continue to do research and get recommendations.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書........................................................................................................................i
中文摘要...........................................................................................................................ii
英文摘要..........................................................................................................................iii
目錄.................................................................................................................................. v
圖次................................................................................................................................. vii
表次..................................................................................................................................ix
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機.................................................................................. 1
第二節 研究範圍與目的.................................................................................. 4
第三節 觀念架構與研究流程.......................................................................... 6
第四節 研究方法.............................................................................................. 9
第五節 論文內容............................................................................................. 11
第二章 文獻回顧與探討.............................................................................................. 12
第一節 SWOT 分析........................................................................................ 12
第二節 產業五力分析.................................................................................... 14
第三節 關鍵成功因素.................................................................................... 16
第四節 資源基礎觀點(RBV)與競爭優勢..................................................... 17
第五節 平衡計分卡........................................................................................ 18
第六節 策略地圖............................................................................................ 27
第七節 專案管理(Project Management)........................................................ 38
第三章 個案公司分析.................................................................................................. 43
第一節 成立緣由............................................................................................ 43
第二節 發展歷程............................................................................................ 46
第三節 經營管理............................................................................................ 50
第四節 營業現況............................................................................................ 54
第五節 現有策略定位與商業模式................................................................ 58
第四章 工程服務產業分析.......................................................................................... 61
v
第一節 工程服務產業市場分析.................................................................... 61
第二節 產業關鍵成功因素(Key Successful Factor, KSF) ............................ 65
第三節 產業五力分析(Five Forces Analysis)................................................ 68
第四節 外部環境分析.................................................................................... 72
第五章 個案公司預警節點模組分析.......................................................................... 74
第一節 個案公司 SWOT 分析....................................................................... 74
第二節 預警模組啟用前專案分析................................................................ 81
第三節 啟用預警模組後專案分析................................................................ 87
第四節 個案公司策略地圖............................................................................ 92
第五節 單位組織重整.................................................................................. 105
第六章 結論與建議.................................................................................................... 106
第一節 研究結論.......................................................................................... 106
第二節 研究建議...........................................................................................111
第三節 後續研究建議...................................................................................114
第七章 參考文獻........................................................................................................ 116
一、中文部分.................................................................................................116
二、外文部分.................................................................................................117
三、參考網站.................................................................................................118
附錄.............................................................................................................................. 119
附錄一:創立初期組織表.............................................................................119
附錄二:協力廠商完工績效考核表............................................................ 120
附錄三:工程竣工之客戶滿意度調查表.................................................... 121
附錄四:保固期滿之客戶滿意度調查表.................................................... 122
附錄四:代操作期間之客戶滿意度調查表................................................ 123
附錄五:水處理助劑之客戶滿意度調查表................................................ 124
附錄六:訪談問卷範本................................................................................ 125
參考文獻 References
中文部分
1. 方至民,2015,策略管理-建立企業永續競爭力,四版,新北,前程文化事業有限公司。
2. 王嘉男、朱彥貞,科學發展 2014 年2 月第494 期,台北市,財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心,
3. 朱道凱譯,Robert S. Kaplan,David P. Norton著,2008,平衡計分卡:化策略為行動績效管理工具(新版),二版,台北,臉譜出版:家庭傳媒城邦分公司發行。
4. 李明譯,Larry Bossidy & Ram Charan 著,2017,執行力-沒有執行力哪有競爭力,四版,台北,遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。
5. 李政賢譯,Robert K. Yin 著,2014,質性研究:從開始到完成,一版,台北,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
6. 周旭華 譯,Michael E. Porter著,2008,競爭策略-產業環境及競爭者分析,二版,台北,天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
7. 林益生,2008,平衡計分卡運用在企業總部及策略事業單位間之綜效研究:以C電信公司為例,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
8. 高登第、李明軒 譯,Michael E. Porter著,2004,競爭論,一版,台北,天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
9. 陳正平等譯,Robert S. Kaplan,David P. Norton著,2013,策略地圖:串連組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具,二版,台北,臉譜出版:家庭傳媒城邦分公司發行。
10. 黃秀媛 譯,W. Chan Kim & Renee Mauborgne 合著,2005,藍海策略:開創無人競爭的全新市場,一版,台北,天下遠見。
11. 黃啟昌,2011,工程服務業因應能源氣候年代之經營策略-以台灣的工程公司為例,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
12. 管孟忠譯,John M. Nichoias & Herma Steyn著,2016,專案管理(初版),新北市,高立圖書有限公司。
13. 齊若蘭 譯,Peter F. Drucker著,2016杜拉克談高效能的五個習慣,初版,台北,遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
14. 遠勤管理顧問公司策略績效事業部譯, Robert S. Kaplan,David P. Norton著,2001,策略核心組織:以平衡計分卡有效執行企業策略,台北市:臉譜出版:城邦文化發行
15. 潘淑滿,2003,質性研究:理論與應用,新北,心理出版社股份有限公司
16. 謝育容譯,大前研一著,2006,創新者的思考-看見生意與創意的源頭,初版,台北,商周出版:城邦文化事業股份有限公司。
二、外文部分
1. Andrews, K.R.,1987, The Concept of Corporation Strategy, Third Edition, US, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
2. Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sutained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, 1991, No. 17
3. Collis, D. J.,& Montgomery, C. A., Competing on Resources, HBR, July-Augest,1995. Page 118~128
4. Creelman, James & Tor Inge Vasshus. 2007. From Performance Measurement to Strategic Alignment: the Balanced Scorecard has come a long way. Corporater. http://www.corporater.com/forums/alignment-review.aspx
5. Creelman, James & Tor Inge Vasshus. 2006. The Balanced Scorecard Manager: A New Profession for the Knowledge-Era. Corporater. http://www.corporater.com/forums/http//www.corporater.com/Default.aspx?tabid=436
6. Daniel, D. Ronald, "Management Information Crisis," Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct., 1961.
7. Goold, Michael & Andrew Campbell, 1998, Desperately Seeking Synergy, Harvard Business Review, September-October 1998
8. Kaplan, Robert S. & David P. Norton. 2005. The Office of Strategy Management. Harvard Business Review. October 2005.
9. Michael E. Porter 1996, What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review. March 2001.
10. Michael. E. Porter, 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Fress Press
11. Michael E. Porter, Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review. November-December 1996. pp. 61-78.
12. Norton, David P. 2000. The Corporate Scorecard: Making the Whole Greater Than the Sum of the Parts. Balanced Scorecard Report. January-February 2000.
13. Parmenter, David. 2008. “How to implement a balanced scorecard in 16 Weeks not 16 months.”
14. Raynor, Michael E. & Joseph L. Bower. Lead from the Center: How to Manage Divisions Dynamically. Harvard Business Review. May 2001. pp.92-100
15. Rockart, John F., "Chief executives define their own data needs", Harvard Business Review 1979 (2), pages 81-93.
16. Weihrich H.,The TOWS Martix: A Tool for Situational Analysis, Journal of Long Range Planning, 1982
17. Wernerfelt, H., "A Resource-based View of The Firm", Atrategic Management Journal, 1984, Vol. 5
18. Yin, P. K. 1994. Case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
三、參考網站
1. 中華民國能源技術服務商業同業公會
http://www.esco.org.tw/web/index/index.jsp
2. 台灣區環境保護工程專業營造業同業公會
http://www.teea.org.tw/
3. 社團法人中華專案管理學會( National Project Management Association, NPMA)
http://www.npma.org.tw/index.htm
4. 產業價值鏈資訊平台
http://ic.tpex.org.tw
5. 經濟部水利署全球網
https://www.wra.gov.tw/
6. 臺灣證券交易所公開資訊觀測站
http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/index
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code